Just as with C++, the standards committee maintains a public archive, which includes proposals for additions and defect reports: sc2. (This Rationale is not part of American National Standard X, but is included for .. Programming in C Markup by [email protected], revising the International Standard for the C programming language; and it retains .. not a rationale for the C language as a whole: the C89 Committee was .

Author: Dushicage Akinoramar
Country: Oman
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Technology
Published (Last): 27 November 2017
Pages: 77
PDF File Size: 4.31 Mb
ePub File Size: 8.45 Mb
ISBN: 379-4-93687-479-4
Downloads: 54100
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Toll

Retrieved 27 April Supports all features except C99 complex numbers and VLA, and minor restrictions on switch statements no Duff’s device. I searched over this article by Dennis Ritchie himself on developing the language, and didn’t spot anything.

Personal tools Log in.

Similar examples with initialized structures should also be possible. Each participating country adopts the standard into their own standards system some use rationalf same document number and in some cases changes are made to the document, though the technical content should and really must remain the same. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Free Software Foundation, Inc.

You are really genius. See live rationnale here http: Sign up using Facebook. Where I’ve looked I’ve tried finding an answer to this here and through general web-search-fu, with no luck: It is just about practice and experience. Much effort went into developing a memory modelin order to clarify sequence points and to support threaded programming.

variables – What is the rationale behind tentative definitions in C? – Stack Overflow

This is also effectively available for rationzle as N Oct 20 ’15 at Peter’s paragraph beginning “Before ” and the next covers my point in slightly different wording; I don’t think there’s a need to edit his answer to cover my point. Some of the facets of the spirit of C can be summarized in phrases like: Since ratification of the C standard, the standards working group prepared technical reports tationale improved support for embedded processing, additional character data types Unicode supportand library functions with improved bounds checking.


Sign up using Email and Password. Prices quoted here are current as of the date each was written but are not guaranteed to remain unchanged. Retrieved 15 February Sign up or log in Sign up using Google.

c89 – Rationale for pre-C99 C not having initial declarations in for loops? – Stack Overflow

My question is, what is rationale for allowing tentative definitions? The only people who can answer this are the authors, anyone else would just be speculating. C99 introduced several new features, many of which had v99 been implemented as extensions in rationaale compilers: Retrieved 14 September Retrieved 31 January Retrieved 14 October Variables defined in the control part of a for loop were not at the start of a block, so there was no expectation that they’d be supported.

Stack Overflow works best with JavaScript enabled.

Is there any use of this in C? In this specific case, you could avoid the need for a tentative declaration by adding an extern to the first line making it just a declaration. Archived from the original on 3 May So, why was this syntax “feature” initially omitted?

Oct 18 ’15 at rationwle Pre-C89 implementations exhibit rahionale least four different modelslisted here in order of increasing restrictiveness:. Make it fast, even if it is not guaranteed to be portable.

The Standard

What rationalee the rationale behind tentative definitions in C? That discussion was often mostly along the lines of “would anything else in C break if we added this? Here’s an example of a case where it’s useful: I wish compiler writers would recognize that Undefined Rationzle was meant as an invitation for compiler writers to use cc99 with regard to precedents and the needs of programmers which would often vary depending upon target platform and application fieldrather than as an invitation to throw judgment out the window.


Retrieved 23 September Why did the original C language not support initial declarations in for loop initializations? It’s similar to the “not adding features unless programmers are stopped from getting something done” idea in the answer, but captures a slightly different way of looking at the problem.

The Spirit of C

Mostly [ citation needed ]. Retrieved from ” https: The … overall goal was to develop a clear, consistent, and unambiguous Standard for [C] which codifies the common, existing definition of C and which promotes the portability of user programs… The original X3J11 charter clearly mandated codifying common existing practice, and the C89 Committee held fast to precedent wherever that was clear and unambiguous.

If an actual definition is found later in the translation unit, then the tentative definition just acts as a declaration. As to how things evolved The C89 committee invented the concept of tentative definition to handle this situation.

Although it strove to give programmers the opportunity to write truly portable programs, the C89 Committee did not want to force programmers into writing portably, to preclude the use of C as a “high-level assembler”: Retrieved 9 January However, they are enabled only through the undocumented command-line switch “-za99”.

The potential for efficient code generation is one of the most important strengths of C.