JOURNAL ODONTECTOMY PDF

Advertisements on this site do not constitute a guarantee or endorsement by the journal, Association, or publisher of the quality or value of such product or of the. The aim of this study was to compare the sequelae of coronectomy with odontectomy in impacted mandibular third molars. Patients and. Coronectomy (intentional partial odontectomy of lower third molars) . of the infection and is preferred by this author to “intentional partial odontectomy. .. on this site do not constitute a guarantee or endorsement by the journal, Association, .

Author: Najinn Fauhn
Country: Suriname
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Health and Food
Published (Last): 21 January 2012
Pages: 344
PDF File Size: 7.22 Mb
ePub File Size: 10.24 Mb
ISBN: 193-9-56977-115-1
Downloads: 58356
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Dairg

Also, sensory abnormality was not found in any patients after IPO.

Comparing pain in piezosurgery group at different follow-up days Click here to view. Inferior alveolar nerve injury IANI is the most common complication during the extraction surgery [ 2 ].

Intentional partial odontectomy—a long-term follow-up study

Support Center Support Center. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. Prevention of damage to the inferior dental nerve during the extraction of mandibular third molars. Comparing pain in micromotor and piezosurgery group Click here to view. Coronectomy of the lower third molar is safe within the first 3 years. In our study, postoperative infection was not observed in the IPO site. The influence of cryotherapy on reduction of swelling, pain and trismus after third-molar extraction: The mean follow-up period was Br Dent J ; There was a mean increase in migration when the distance from the inferior border of IAN until the apex of the retained mandibular third molar root was measured which was by 3.

A review of coronectomy. Alveolar bones around the impacted crown were removed with a surgical bur to expose the cementoenamel junction CEJ of the tooth, and the tooth was sectioned at the junction. Related articles Extraction lower third molars micromotor odontectomy pain piezosurgery swelling trismus. Discussion To avoid complications when a mandibular third molar is impacted close to an IAN canal, IPO is considered as an alternative treatment to the surgical extraction [ 6 ].

  FISHER SCIENTIFIC SONIC DISMEMBRATOR MODEL 100 PDF

However, in this case, the bone odontwctomy the resected root was intact, and there was not a sign of infection in the IPO site. Lower third molar surgery—consent and coronectomy. YPY participated in the study design and performed the statistical analysis. None, Conflict of Interest: A randomised controlled clinical trial to compare the incidence of injury to the inferior alveolar nerve as a result of coronectomy and removal of mandibular third molars.

Pericoronitis, one of the reasons for extracting the mandibular third molar, is related with the persistence of the dental follicle that could pose as a source of infection. Although histopathologic section was not performed on the symptomatic IPO tooth, our assumption is that the pulp had temporary pulpitis which could have been caused by heat arose from inadequate coolant during the coronectomy.

Therefore, when dental surgeons encounter the odontecomy molar extraction cases, they should initially evaluate difficulties of extraction with radiographic findings.

Int J Oral Surg ;3: Depicting inter group comparison of swelling Click here to view. Incidence of nerve damage following third molar removal: Am J Orthod Oral Surg. Osseous response following resective therapy with piezosurgery.

Intentional partial odontectomy—a long-term follow-up study

Extraction, lower third molars, micromotor, odontectomy, pain, piezosurgery, swelling, trismus. Sarwar H, Mahmood-Rao S. No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; Postsurgical consequences in lower third molar surgical extraction using micromotor and piezosurgery. On statistical analysis, the result in this study showed no statistical difference in both the groups in all the parameters that were taken. Osteotomy done by piezosurgical unit Click here to view.

  EXTRON MGP 464 PDF

Sitemap What’s New Feedback Disclaimer.

Competing interests No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported. Depicting sectioned crown portion of impacted third molar Click here to view. Mandibular third molar removal: A retrospective study of procedures and the decision to repeat the coronectomy in cases of failure.

The effects of operator technique and bur design on temperature during osseous preparation for osteosynthesis self-tapping screws.

How to cite this article: Comparison of coronectomy with odontectomy. Jougnal terms of risk of IANI, it is obvious that decrowning the highly risky, impacted mandibular third molar is safer than the complete extraction. Journwl, Dolonmaz showed that none of the 43 cases were related with postoperative infection, and Porgrel reported only one case of postoperative infection out of 50 IPO journxl [ 1314 ].

There was a problem providing the content you requested

Third molar complications requiring hospitalization. Even the intragroup comparison of piezosurgical group for trismus and swelling showed no statistically significant difference on postoperative day 7, indicating faster recovery of trismus and swelling.

The mean follow-up time was Depicting inter group comparison of inter-incisal opening Click here to view. Footnotes Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article On the recall check, none of the patients had sensory abnormality such as paresthesia and hypoesthesia related with the surgical sites.